DARAB Rules of Procedure – Download as Word Doc .doc /.docx), PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online. resource contains the Republic of the Philippines’ Department of Agrarian Reform Adjudication Board’s (DARAB) rules of procedure for THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM ADJUDICATION BOARD ( DARAB) RULES OF PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS.

Author: Mezticage Shaktiramar
Country: Guyana
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Relationship
Published (Last): 25 August 2007
Pages: 74
PDF File Size: 18.85 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.85 Mb
ISBN: 871-5-28060-480-1
Downloads: 27566
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zulujas

Procedre here is nothing sacred about the forms of pleadings or processes, their sole purpose being to facilitate the application of justice to the rival claims of contending parties. Jurisdiction of the Regional and Provincial Adjudicator.

2009 DARAB Rules of Procedure.pdf

Martinezrendering the pronouncement inapplicable to them now. Igano and concurred in by Vice-Chairman Lorenzo R. In addition, in Province of North Cotabato v.

Land Bank further prayed that the cancellation of its certificates of MERALCO shares be invalidated and the transfer of the shares in favor of Lubrica be quashed, and 2009 the parties be directed to procdure the status quo ante. Effect of forgery on the March 5, Notice of Appeal. Their reliance has unavoidably spawned and will continue to spawn confusion about their rights and can occasion more delays in the settlement of their claims.

The bank shall have the power: We do not see any criminal intent motivating ruls. The pauper litigant as stated in Section 2 of Rule V of these Rules is exempt from the payment of the herein filing fees. Technical Rules Not Applicable.

The following provisions are instructive in making this conclusion: Darb to Arrive at an Amicable Settlement. She must allow the appeal if it is timely and compliant with the reglementary requirements. Where Fees to Be Paid.

Jurisdiction of the Board and its Adjudicators. Non-compliance with the foregoing darabb be a ground ;rocedure dismissal of the appeal. Petitioners moved for reconsideration of the appellate courts March 28, Resolution, alleging that their error in the choice of remedy was excusable as they relied procefure Sec.

Primary and Exclusive Original and Appellate Jurisdiction. V, and to determine if she was administratively liable as a member of the Philippine Bar; and. Those cases previously falling under the original and exclusive jurisdiction of the defunct Court of Agrarian Relations under Section 12 of PD No.

Thus, the RARAD Decision had already attained finality in accordance with the above-quoted rule, notwithstanding Land Banks recourse to the special agrarian court. No costs shall be allowed against the Republic of the Philippines unless otherwise provided by law.


Martinez concerned a different set of facts, a different set of parties, and a different subject matter; it was extraneous darxb the present matter, or to DARAB v. If no new answer is filed, the answer previously pfocedure shall serve as the answer to the amended complaint or petition.

At the hearing, the affidavits submitted by the parties shall constitute the direct testimonies of the witnesses who executed the same. Without pronouncement as to costs. On December 24,the CA denied Land Darb very urgent motion to resolve and supplemental motion. Pursuant to Section 13, Article VIII of the Constitution, I certify that the conclusions in the above decision had been reached in consultation before the case was assigned to the writer of the opinion of the Courts Division. After the decision was rendered by the CA, the record shows that several withdrawals of appeal were allegedly filed with the Office of the Regional Agrarian Reform Adjudicator.

Execution by Motion or by Independent Action.

A mere general denial will not be deemed as an answer. The heirs of the deceased may be allowed to substitute the deceased without requiring the appointment of an executor or administrator. Republic of the Philippines. These matters, while not raised by the parties, are important considerations in resolving the case where one party laments that she is prejudiced by the leniency that is afforded to the other party.

Upon approval of the withdrawal of an appeal, the case shall stand as if no appeal had ever been taken. Only the parties were signatories thereto; Atty. On September 12,DARAB enjoined RARAD Mias from proceeding with the implementation of the decision of January 24,and directed the parties to attend the hearing to determine the propriety of issuing a preliminary or permanent injunction.

Petitioners contention that Dampal must be considered to have had constructive knowledge thereof fails in light of the express darxb for notice to be in writing. Thus, they seek the nullification of the exemption order on the ground that it is counterfeit. As earlier stated, on October 11,the Court resolved Land Bank v. Removal of Improvements on Property Subject of Execution. Similarly, per Presidential Decree No. In view of his active participation in various stages, he cannot now turn his back on the judgment in Land Bank v.

DARAB Rules of – Documents

The enactments of the Legislature decreed that the money to be paid to the landowner as just compensation for the taking of his land is to be taken only from the ARF.


Persons associated in business that are sued under a common name, must all be named individually in the answer filed by them or in their behalf, stating their business address.

All other motions filed before an Answer, except Motions to Dismiss on the ground of prescription, lack of jurisdiction or failure to state a cause of action, improper venue or when there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause or where the cause of action is barred by a prior judgment. The provisions of the Rules of Court shall not apply even in suppletory character unless adopted herein or by resolution of the Board. Appeal shall not stay the execution of a decision or order except when the ejectment of a tenant farmer, agricultural lessee or tiller, settler, or amortizing owner-cultivator is directed, or a decision or a portion thereof involving solely the issue of just compensation.

That in accordance with the relocation and development plans of the St. The prior determination of whether the asset of Land Bank sought to be levied to respond to a judgment liability under the CARP in favor of the landowner was demanded by its being a banking institution created by law, [96] possessed with universal or expanded commercial banking powers [97] by virtue of Presidential Decree No.

Department of Agrarian Reform

By Resolution [7] of May 22,the appellate court denied the motion for reconsideration, holding that nothing in the above-quoted Sec. He may examine the parties and witnesses freely with respect to the matters at issue, and shall limit the right of the parties or proceudre counsels to ask questions only for the purpose of clarifying the points of law at issue or of facts involved in the case.

It is axiomatic that the jurisdiction of a tribunal, including a quasi-judicial officer or government agency, over the nature and subject matter of a petition or complaint is determined by the material allegations therein and the character of the relief prayed for, irrespective of whether the petitioner or complainant is entitled to any or all such reliefs.

PDTC responded to Land Bank that it was not in the position to determine the legality of the demand to comply, and that it pdocedure taking the necessary legal action.