Anarquía, Estado y Utopía has ratings and reviews. Con este libro, Robert Nozick se convirtió en el principal defensor teórico del liberalismo en las . Tratado acerca de la funcion del Estado moderno, en el que se exponen algunas tesis para la posible creacion de un nuevo Estado minimo, asi como una. Anarquia, Estado y Utopia by Robert Nozick, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide.

Author: Vudokora Shakajinn
Country: India
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Relationship
Published (Last): 1 April 2005
Pages: 399
PDF File Size: 19.49 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.33 Mb
ISBN: 145-8-65797-607-3
Downloads: 7296
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kijind

Anarquia, Estado y Utopia : Robert Nozick :

Consider for example a loose equality according to which the richest person has no more than five times the wealth of the poorest person. Everybody gets the same.

The Lockean proviso of not making others worse off by appropriation and transfer can justify limiting property rights and offer compensation though.

I also didn’t find the moral credit he gives to voluntary transactions, and his argument against the arbitrarily of natural assets, to be at the same level of many of the other dstado made here.

With no state, problems will arise. Nozick has two important notions for this: It is clear that this book is a rough sketches of what he was thinking He introduced a first principle out of nowhere. After that things get bad.

I found him to be more or less approachable and sincere. This foundational principal is continued as a supporting layer as more and more layers are built upon it, eventually leading to his description of utopia. To the rich, it is a promise of freedom, but for those who are already poor, it is only a further shackle.


The imaginary perfect world vision of utopia is written much like the social-political structure described by many science fiction novels. One of the very few philosophy books I ever had a hard time putting down. The chapter is a detailed justification for pursuing the state-of-nature theory.

If you’re a smart guy how can you think for etsado stupid guy? Nevertheless, it should be stated somewhere that if you cannot grasp his ideas, you need to read the source texts in order to gain that foundational knowledge.

Jan 24, Mark rated it liked it.

Some may s This book is one of the most unusual in the history of political philosophy, and perhaps one of most brilliant. This is a position between consequentialism and deontology.

Much as we can look at the “historical” allocation and nozico it stinks, it’s the one way of doing things that does not contain philosophical inconsistencies.

Anarquia, Estado y Utopia

Some may seem radical and unpalatable for readers of other political persuasions, but any reader who is open to new ideas should find the reading highly interesting. Any other goods or services should be provided by private actions business or donationsand any redistribution of wealth ASU is robegt classic work of political philosophy and is widely considered to be the definitive text defending libertarian political theory, which claims that the only justifiable form of political society is one with minimal government and laissez-faire economic system.


And believe me, I did estad to like this book. The Lockean proviso of not making others worse off by appropriation and transfer can justify limiting property rights and offer compensation though.

Most of the discussion in part 1 of the book revolves around the “dominant protective association” in a given geographical area. Most importantly, now I know what it does not say. There are plenty of genuine libertarian intellectuals.

Liberty for annarquia, liberty for women, liberty for discriminated minorities.

Anarchy, State, and Utopia

At least Ayn Rand acknowledged the economic side, however. In summary, we cannot improve on the “historical” allocation, at least not from the perspective of justice.

I read this book at University. We tax someone’s earnings, but not their leisure. Nozick was just silent on the topic. One of the best things about him is how he is fairly up front with the weak points of his theory.